This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2009-11-05 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| In the instant petition, petitioners would have us review the factual determinations of the CA. However, settled is the rule that the Court is not a trier of facts and only questions of law are the proper subject of a petition for review on certiorari in this Court.[25] While there are exceptions to this rule,[26] the Court finds that the instant case does not fall under any of them. Hence, the Court sees no reason to disturb the findings of the CA, which are supported by evidence on record. | |||||