Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	AM NO. RTJ-06-2001 2006-08-16	EQUITABLE PCI BANK v. JUDGE CELSO D. LAVIÑA QUISUMBING, J.
Well to reiterate, while this Court will never tolerate or condone any act, conduct or omission that would violate the norm of public accountability or diminish the people's faith in the judiciary, neither will it hesitate to shield those under its employ from unfounded suits that only serve to disrupt rather than promote the orderly administration of justice.[39]
	AM NO. RTJ-03-1794 2005-10-25	P & SUPT. MANUEL P. BARCENA v. JUDGE HENRICK F. GINGOYON QUISUMBING, J.
Similarly, there is no factual support to complainant's charge of bias and partiality. The fact alone that respondent immediately acted on Sheriff Mulat's report concerning the forcible taking and confiscation of the car by issuing the show cause order against complainant and furnishing copies thereof to the Office of the Ombudsman, DILG Secretary, PNP Chief, and NAPOLCOM in no way indicates bias and partiality against complainant. Mere suspicion that a judge was partial is not enough.[30]