You're currently signed in as:
User

SPS. ANGEL AND FELINA DUMAUA v. JUDGE ANGERICO B. RAMIREZ

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2006-07-11
TINGA, J.
The public's faith and confidence in the judicial system depends, to a large extent, on the judicious and prompt disposition of cases and other matters pending before the courts. The Constitution, no less, fixes a reglementary period of 90 days within which judges must resolve motions or incidents pending before them. Their failure to so decide a case or resolve a motion within this reglementary period constitutes gross inefficiency and warrants the imposition of administrative sanctions against the erring magistrate.[6]