This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2009-02-10 |
NACHURA, J. |
||||
| Indeed, this Court had, in a number of cases involving substantially the same factual milieu as in the present case, convicted the accused of the crime of robbery with intimidation. These include the early cases of People v. Francisco[42] and United States v. Sanchez,[43] and the more recent cases of Fortuna v. People[44] and Pablo v. People.[45] | |||||
|
2007-07-30 |
TINGA, J. |
||||
| Article 294, paragraph (5) of the Revised Penal Code fixes the penalty for simple robbery at prision correccional in its maximum period to prision mayor in its medium period, the range of which is from four (4) years, two (2) months and one (1) day to ten (10) years.[56] Considering the aggravating circumstance of abuse of superior strength, the penalty should be imposed in its maximum period while the minimum shall be taken from the penalty next lower in degree, which is arresto mayor maximum to prision correccional medium in any of its periods, the range of which is four (4) months and one (1) day to four (4) years and two (2) months.[57] | |||||