This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2012-12-05 |
PEREZ, J. |
||||
| Primarily, only errors of law and not of facts are reviewable by this Court in a Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court.[61] This Court is not a trier of facts and it is beyond its function to re-examine and weigh anew the respective evidence of the parties.[62] Besides, this Court adheres to the long standing doctrine that the factual findings of the trial court, especially when affirmed by the Court of Appeals, are conclusive on the parties and this Court.[63] Nonetheless, this Court has, at times, allowed exceptions thereto, to wit: (a) When the findings are grounded entirely on speculation, surmises, or conjectures; | |||||
|
2009-12-11 |
CARPIO, J. |
||||
| The law makes no presumption of agency and proving its existence, nature and extent is incumbent upon the person alleging it.[50] Whether or not an agency has been created is a question to be determined by the fact that one represents and is acting for another. [51] | |||||