This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2009-11-05 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| Moreover, the filing of the complaint by petitioner cannot be used as a basis for strained relations. As a rule, no strained relations should arise from a valid and legal act asserting one's right.[40] Likewise, respondent's claim that it was betrayed by petitioner, after several accommodations it had extended to him,[41] deserves scant consideration. On this note, the NLRC was categorical that no such accommodation existed, to wit: On the argument that Cabigting was merely accommodated by the respondent after the closure of the Tacoma Warehouse, it, however, appears that no such accommodation existed. x x x[42] | |||||