You're currently signed in as:
User

PROSECUTOR ROBERT M. VISBAL v. JUDGE ROGELIO C. SESCON

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2009-01-29
LEONARDO-DE CASTRO, J.
Respondent Judge cannot pass on the blame to his Clerk of Court and/or Stenographer.  A judge cannot take refuge behind the inefficiency or mismanagement of his very own court personnel.  Certainly, a judge is responsible not only for the dispensation of justice but also for managing his court efficiently to ensure the prompt delivery of court services.[20]  In the discharge of the functions of his office, respondent Judge must strive to act in a manner that puts him and his conduct above reproach and beyond suspicion. He must act with extreme care for his office indeed is laden with a heavy burden of responsibility.[21]  Surely, a judge is enjoined to pore over all documents whereon he is required to affix his signature and give his official imprimatur.[22]  The negligence of respondent Judge in this case simply cannot be countenanced.