You're currently signed in as:
User

ASIAN CONSTRUCTION v. COMFAC CORPORATION

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2014-09-29
LEONEN, J.
Besides, as pointed out by respondent, petitioner did not object to the admissibility of the 622 withholding tax certificates when these were formally offered by respondent before the tax court.[17]  Hence, petitioner is deemed to have admitted the validity of these documents.[18]  Petitioner's "failure to object to the offered evidence renders it admissible, and the court cannot, on its own, disregard such evidence."[19]
2012-02-01
VELASCO JR., J.
Respondents failed to make a timely objection to the police report's presentation in evidence; thus, they are deemed to have waived their right to do so.[25] As a result, the police report is still admissible in evidence.