Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 194169 2013-12-04	ROMEO R. ARAULLO v. OFFICE OF OMBUDSMAN DEL CASTILLO, J.
The above CA judgment became final and executory after it was affirmed by this Court via a Decision[5] dated November 29, 2006 in G.R. No. 167723. Thus, the labor case was remanded to the NLRC for computation of petitioner's actual entitlements.
	GR No. 202358 2013-11-27	GATCHALIAN REALTY v. EVELYN M. ANGELES CARPIO, J.
The registry return of the registered mail is prima facie proof of the facts indicated therein.[23] Angeles failed to present contrary evidence to rebut this presumption with competent and proper evidence. To establish its claim of service of the notarial rescission upon Angeles, GRI presented the affidavit of its liaison officer Fortunato Gumahad,[24] the registry receipt from the Greenhills Post Office,[25] and the registry return receipt.[26] We affirm the CA's ruling that GRI was able to substantiate its claim that it served Angeles the notarial rescission sent through registered mail in accordance with the requirements of R.A. 6552.