This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2011-05-31 |
MENDOZA, J. |
||||
| In her reply[5] to Quitorio's comment, Judge Tan averred that it was not only full of lies but it was also libelous. She countered that the real reason why Quitorio had not been reporting for work was not his optional retirement but his suspension from office for three months without pay and with stern warning after having been found guilty of simple misconduct in an en banc decision of this Court in A.M. No. 06-6-340-RTC.[6] In another administrative case, namely, A.M. No. 06-4-220-RTC,[7] Quitorio was found guilty of simple neglect of duty. He was fined P3,000.00 and warned that a repetition of the same offense would be dealt with more severely. | |||||