This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2007-11-23 |
NACHURA, J. |
||||
| It bears emphasizing that money bears no earmarks of peculiar ownership,[34] and this characteristic is all the more manifest in the instant case which involves money in a banking transaction gone awry. Its primary function is to pass from hand to hand as a medium of exchange, without other evidence of its title.[35] Money, which had passed through various transactions in the general course of banking business, even if of traceable origin, is no exception. | |||||