You're currently signed in as:
User

DAYAN STA. ANA CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION v. ATTY. NAPOLEON A. ESPIRITU

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2009-07-31
NACHURA, J.
The Court notes that despite the opportunity accorded to respondent to refute the charges against him, he failed to do so or even offer a valid explanation.[7] It is incumbent upon respondent to meet the issue and overcome the evidence against him. He must show proof that he still maintains that degree of morality and integrity which at all times is expected of him. These, respondent miserably failed to do.[8]