This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2012-02-01 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| Time and again, it has been held that the right to appeal is not a natural right or a part of due process, but merely a statutory privilege and may be exercised only in the manner and in accordance with the provisions of the law. The party who seeks to avail of the same must comply with the requirements of the rules, failing in which the right to appeal is lost.[35] | |||||
|
2006-12-06 |
CARPIO MORALES, J. |
||||
| It bears emphasis that all that is required to perfect the appeal is the posting of a bond to ensure that the award is eventually paid should the appeal be dismissed. Petitioners should thus have posted a bond, even if it were only partial, but they did not. No relaxation of the Rule may thus be considered.[32] | |||||
|
2006-03-26 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| Time and again, it has been held that the right to appeal is not a natural right or a part of due process, but merely a statutory privilege and may be exercised only in the manner and in accordance with the provisions of the law. The party who seeks to avail of the same must comply with the requirements of the rules, failing in which the right to appeal is lost. [32] Having failed to comply with the requirements set forth in the rules, petitioner's appeal was appropriately dismissed by the Court of Appeals. | |||||