This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2009-02-19 |
QUISUMBING, J. |
||||
| Moreover, a perusal of the issues raised by petitioners, although alleging grave abuse of discretion, are clearly for the correction of errors of judgment, not errors of jurisdiction.[23] If indeed errors of facts and erroneous appreciation of facts had been committed by the appellate court, still these would not amount to grave abuse of discretion. Where the issue or question involved affects the wisdom of the decision - not the jurisdiction of the court to render the decision - the same is beyond the province of a special civil action for certiorari.[24] | |||||