This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2009-07-03 |
BRION, J. |
||||
| We find a review of the facts of the present case and of the applicable law on exemption from liability compelling because of the patent errors the CA committed in these regards. Specifically, the CA's findings of fact on the issues of age and minority, premised on the supposed absence of evidence, are contradicted by the evidence on record; it also manifestly overlooked certain relevant facts not disputed by the parties that, if properly considered, would justify a different conclusion.[25] | |||||