You're currently signed in as:
User

RONALD ALLAN POE v. GLORIA MACAPAGAL-ARROYO

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2010-11-23
NACHURA, J.
But even if his submission is valid, petitioner's standing is still imperiled by the white elephant in the petition, i.e., his appearance as counsel for former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo (Macapagal-Arroyo) in the election protest filed by 2004 presidential candidate Fernando Poe, Jr. before the Presidential Electoral Tribunal,[13] because judicial inquiry, as mentioned above, requires that the constitutional question be raised at the earliest possible opportunity.[14] Such appearance as counsel before the Tribunal, to our mind, would have been the first opportunity to challenge the constitutionality of the Tribunal's constitution.