This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2008-07-28 |
CORONA, J. |
||||
| Petitioners' first argument necessitates a review of the facts of the case which, as a general rule, is not the task of this Court. Under Rule 45 of the Rules, this Court shall not pass upon the findings of fact by lower courts unless they ignored salient points that would otherwise affect the outcome of the case.[14] There is no reason for us to overturn the factual conclusions of the lower courts. | |||||
|
2007-03-09 |
CORONA, J. |
||||
| The rule is that the findings of fact by the lower court,[19] if affirmed by the CA, are conclusive on us.[20] Absent any reason that compels us to deviate from the rule, as in this case, we shall not disturb such findings. | |||||