You're currently signed in as:
User

SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM v. ROSANNA H. AGUAS

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2009-09-11
NACHURA, J.
Incessantly, we have declared that factual findings of the CA supported by substantial evidence, are conclusive and binding.[8] In an appeal via certiorari, the Court may not review the factual findings of the CA. It is not the Court's function under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court to review, examine, and evaluate or weigh the probative value of the evidence presented.[9]
2008-08-29
REYES, R.T., J.
Social Security System v. Aguas[16] is instructive in determining the extent of the required "dependency" under the SS Law. In Aguas, the Court ruled that although a husband and wife are obliged to support each other, whether one is actually dependent for support upon the other cannot be presumed from the fact of marriage alone.[17]