This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2009-02-18 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| On 23 March 2006, notwithstanding the escape of accused-appellant from prison, the Court of Appeals granted PAO's Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant's Brief, in view of the ruling of the Supreme Court in People v. Flores,[11] making the review of death penalty cases mandatory. The period of extension granted had lapsed without the accused-appellant filing his brief; thus, the Court of Appeals required the PAO to show cause why the latter should not be held in contempt for failing to file the same.[12] | |||||