Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 159381 2010-03-26	DANILO D. ANSALDO DEL CASTILLO, J.
For petitioner to be convicted of the complex crime of estafa through falsification of public document committed in the manner described in the Information, all the elements of the two crimes of estafa and falsification of public document must exist.[9]
	GR No. 181409 2010-02-11	INTESTATE ESTATE OF MANOLITA GONZALES VDA. DE CARUNGCONG v. PEOPLE CORONA, J.
True, the concurrence of all the elements of the two crimes of estafa and falsification of public document is required for a proper conviction for the complex crime of estafa through falsification of public document. That is the ruling in Gonzaludo v. People.[46] It means that the prosecution must establish that the accused resorted to the falsification of a public document as a necessary means to commit the crime of estafa.
	GR No. 159404 2008-06-27	RIZZA LAO v. PEOPLE AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
(4) that as a result thereof, the offended party suffered damage.[23] Records show that the above elements were established beyond reasonable doubt by the prosecution in the instant case.