This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2015-07-06 |
SERENO, C.J. |
||||
| The Contract of Employment signed by respondent is first and foremost a contract, which has the force of law between the parties as long as its stipulations are not contrary to law, morals, public order, or public policy. We had occasion to rule that stipulations providing that either party may terminate a contract even without cause are legitimate if exercised in good faith.[86] Thus, while either party has the right to terminate the contract at will, it cannot not act purposely to injure the other.[87] | |||||
|
2014-01-15 |
BERSAMIN, J. |
||||
| principle of the law which holds that no subject or citizen can lawfully do that which has a tendency to be injurious to the public or against the public good."[19] Unjust enrichment exists, according to Hulst v. PR Builders, Inc.,[20] "when a person unjustly retains a benefit at the loss of another, or when a person retains money or property of another against the fundamental principles of justice, equity | |||||