This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2007-11-23 |
NACHURA, J. |
||||
| Further, the grant of the benefit of regularization should not be limited to the employees who questioned their status before the labor tribunal/court and asserted their rights; it should also extend to those similarly situated.[10] There is, thus, no merit in petitioner's contention that only those who presented their circumstances of employment to the courts are entitled to regularization.[11] | |||||