This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2012-04-24 |
VELASCO JR., J. |
||||
| It bears stressing that "[o]wnership is defined as a relation in law by virtue of which a thing pertaining to one person is completely subjected to his will in everything not prohibited by law or the concurrence with the rights of another."[18] The attributes of ownership are: jus utendi or the right to possess and enjoy, jus fruendi or the right to the fruits, jus abutendi or the right to abuse or consume, jus disponendi or the right to dispose or alienate, and jus vindicandi or the right to recover or vindicate.[19] | |||||
|
2009-11-27 |
BRION, J. |
||||
| Notably, the requirement of the existence of tenurial relationship has been relaxed in the cases of Islanders CARP-Farmers Beneficiaries Muti-Purpose Cooperative, Inc. v. Lapanday Agricultural and Dev't. Corporation[30] and Cubero v. Laguna West Multi-Purpose Cooperative, Inc.[31] The Court, speaking through former Chief Justice Panganiban, declared in Islanders that:[The definition of `agrarian dispute' in RA No. 6657 is] broad enough to include disputes arising from any tenurial arrangement beyond the traditional landowner-tenant or lessor-lessee relationship. xxx [A]grarian reform extends beyond the mere acquisition and redistribution of land, the law acknowledges other modes of tenurial arrangements to effect the implementation of CARP.[32] | |||||