You're currently signed in as:
User

MAXIMO DUMADAG v. ERNESTO L. LUMAYA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2004-11-23
CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
In the earlier case of Aya v. Bigornia,[31] the Court ruled that money collected by a lawyer in favor of his clients must be immediately turned over to them and failure to do so merits a penalty of suspension for six months.  In Daroy v. Legaspi,[32] the Court held that lawyers are bound to promptly account for money or property received by them on behalf of their clients and failure to do constitutes professional misconduct warranting disbarment.  Subsequently, in the case of Obia v. Catimbang,[33] respondent Atty. Basilio M. Catimbang was ordered indefinitely suspended for failure to return the amount of P11,000 entrusted to him.  Still later, in Dumadag v. Lumaya,[34] the Court likewise ordered the indefinite suspension of Atty. Ernesto L. Lumaya for his receipt of and failure to deliver the amount of P4,344 to his client, complainant in the case.