You're currently signed in as:
User

VICTOR D. YOUNG v. CA

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2008-01-29
CORONA, J.
It was then that respondents committed a breach of duty to pay their remaining obligation to the former.[21] Thus, the ten-year prescriptive period should be reckoned from January 14, 1980. Petitioner had until January 14, 1990 to file suit so that, when it sued on August 27, 1993, the action had already prescribed.
2003-12-11
QUISUMBING, J.
The addition of other obligations likewise did not extinguish the promissory notes.  In Young v. CA[63], this Court ruled that a change in the incidental elements of, or an addition of such element to, an obligation, unless otherwise expressed by the parties will not result in its extinguishment.