This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2011-10-19 |
SERENO, J. |
||||
| Fifth, the presumption that the police officers regularly performed their duty cannot, standing alone, defeat the presumption of innocence of the accused herein. Generally, law enforcers are presumed to have regularly performed their duty,[40] but this is a mere procedural presumption which cannot overturn the constitutionally recognized presumption of innocence of the accused where lapses in the buy bust operation are shown. As we held in People v. Sanchez,[41] | |||||