This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2011-12-13 |
PER CURIAM |
||||
| In Collantes v. Renomeron, [37] we ruled therein that the misconduct of the respondent therein as a public official also constituted a violation of his oath as a lawyer: As the late Chief Justice Fred Ruiz Castro said: | |||||
|
2005-03-08 |
PER CURIAM |
||||
| Indeed, in the case of Collantes v. Atty. Vicente C. Renomeron,[33] we ordered the disbarment of respondent on the ground of his dismissal from government service because of grave misconduct. Quoting the late Chief Justice Fred Ruiz Castro, we declared | |||||
|
2004-09-03 |
YNARES-SANTIAGO, J. |
||||
| Rule 7.03. A lawyer shall not engage in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law, nor shall he, whether in public or private life, behave in a scandalous manner to the discredit of the legal profession.[24] | |||||