You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

RE: REQUEST OF JUSTICE JOSEFINA GUEVARA-SALONGA

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

AM No. 12-8-07-CA
2015-06-16
RE: LETTER OF CA JUSTICE VICENTE S.E. VELOSO FOR ENTITLEMENT TO LONGEVITY PAY FOR HIS SERVICES AS COMMISSION MEMBER III OF NLRC RE: REQUEST OF CA JUSTICE REMEDIOS A. SALAZAR-FERNANDO THAT HER SERVICES AS MTC JUDGE
BRION, J.
In considering the longevity pay in the cases of Justices Guevarra-Salonga and Dela Fuente, the Court mistakenly recognized their services as prosecutors to be services in the Judiciary, because RA 10071[60] granted prosecutors the same rank and benefits (including retirement benefits) as their counterparts in the Judiciary.
AM No. 12-8-07-CA
2015-06-16
RE: LETTER OF CA JUSTICE VICENTE S.E. VELOSO FOR ENTITLEMENT TO LONGEVITY PAY FOR HIS SERVICES AS COMMISSION MEMBER III OF NLRC RE: REQUEST OF CA JUSTICE REMEDIOS A. SALAZAR-FERNANDO THAT HER SERVICES AS MTC JUDGE
BRION, J.
In In Re: Request of Justice Bernardo P. Pardo for Adjustment of His Longevity Pay,[15] we held that the inclusion of Justice Pardo’s service in the COMELEC in the computation of his longevity pay upon his retirement was predicated on the factual circumstances peculiar to him: he was an incumbent CA Justice when he was appointed COMELEC Chairman, and was appointed to the Supreme Court after his service with the COMELEC, without any interruption in his service.