This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2008-02-29 |
VELASCO JR., J. |
||||
| On the other hand, Nicholson, banking on De Leon v. Rehabilitation Finance Corporation[11] and Wong v. IAC,[12] contends that Metrobank failed to overcome the legal presumption that the disputed property is conjugal. He asserts that Metrobank's arguments on the matter of presumption are misleading as only one postulate needs to be shown for the presumption in favor of conjugal ownership to arise, that is, the fact of acquisition during marriage. Nicholson dismisses, as inapplicable, Francisco and Jocson, noting that they are relevant only when there is no indication as to the exact date of acquisition of the property alleged to be conjugal. | |||||