Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

C.T. TORRES ENTERPRISES v. ROMEO J. HIBIONADA

This case has been cited 6 times or more.

	GR No. 172438 2012-07-04	METROPOLITAN CEBU WATER DISTRICT v. MACTAN ROCK INDUSTRIES MENDOZA, J.
The ponencia further quoted from C.T. Torres Enterprises, Inc. v. Hibionada:[56]
	GR No. 187978 2010-11-24	ROMULO R. PERALTA v. RAUL E. DE LEON PEREZ, J.
As observed in C.T. Torres Enterprises, Inc. v. Hibionada:[22]
	GR No. 166910 2010-10-19	ERNESTO B. FRANCISCO v. TOLL REGULATORY BOARD VELASCO JR., J.
To summarize, the fact that an administrative agency is exercising its administrative or executive functions (such as the granting of franchises or awarding of contracts) and at the same time exercising its quasi-legislative (e.g. rule-making) and/or quasi-judicial functions (e.g. rate-fixing), does not support a finding of a violation of due process or the Constitution. In C.T. Torres Enterprises, Inc. v. Hibionada,[79] We explained the rationale, thus: It is by now commonplace learning that many administrative agencies exercise and perform adjudicatory powers and functions, though to a limited extent only. Limited delegation of judicial or quasi-judicial authority to administrative agencies (e.g. the Securities and Exchange Commission and the National Labor Relations Commission) is well recognized in our jurisdiction, basically because the need for special competence and experience has been recognized as essential in the resolution of questions of complex or specialized character and because of a companion recognition that the dockets of our regular courts have remained crowded and clogged.
	GR No. 171763 2009-06-05	MARIA LUISA PARK ASSOCIATION v. SAMANTHA MARIE T. ALMENDRAS QUISUMBING, J.
As observed in C.T. Torres Enterprises, Inc. v. Hibionada:[30]
	GR No. 131903 2008-06-26	RAGASA v. CA CARPIO, J.
As observed in C.T. Torres Enterprises, Inc. v. Hibionada:[29]
	GR NO. 162774 2006-04-07	SPS. EDMUNDO T. OSEA AND LIGAYA R. OSEA v. ANTONIO G. AMBROSIO CARPIO MORALES, J.
As observed in C.T. Torres Enterprises, Inc. v. Hibionada:[14]