This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2007-03-14 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| In People v. Cabale[22] and People v. Atienza[23] where the same issue was raised under similar circumstances, we held that while the arraignment of appellant was conducted after the cases had been submitted for decision, the error is non-prejudicial and has been fully cured. Since appellant's rights and interests were not prejudiced by this lapse in procedure, it only follows that his constitutional right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him was not violated. | |||||