This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2008-10-08 |
VELASCO JR., J. |
||||
| This Court has declared in a number of decisions that a transferee pendente lite stands in exactly the same position as its predecessor-in-interest, the original defendant, and is bound by the proceedings had in the case before the property was transferred to it. It is a proper but not an indispensible party as it would in any event be bound by the judgment against his predecessor. This would follow even if it is not formally included as a defendant through an amendment of the complaint.[14] (Emphasis supplied.) | |||||