You're currently signed in as:
User

CHARLES L. YANG v. CA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2008-12-18
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
Specifically, the Court, in Yang v. Court of Appeals,[37] ruled that Batas Pambansa (B.P.) Blg. 129[38] conferred upon the CA exclusive appellate jurisdiction over appeals from decisions of the PRC.  The Court held:The law has since been changed, however, at least in the matter of the particular court to which appeals from the Commission should be taken.  On August 14, 1981, Batas Pambansa Bilang 129 became effective and in its Section 29, conferred on the Court of Appeals "exclusive appellate jurisdiction over all final judgments, decisions, resolutions, orders or awards of Regional Trial Courts and quasi-judicial agencies, instrumentalities, boards or commissions except those falling under the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. x x x."  In virtue of BP 129, appeals from the Professional Regulations Commission are now exclusively cognizable by the Court of Appeals.[39]  (Emphasis supplied)