This case has been cited 3 times or more.
|
2010-06-23 |
VILLARAMA, JR., J. |
||||
| An action for injunction is brought specifically to restrain or command the performance of an act.[24] It is distinct from the ancillary remedy of preliminary injunction, which cannot exist except only as part or as an incident to an independent action or proceeding. Moreover, in an action for injunction, the auxiliary remedy of a preliminary prohibitory or mandatory injunction may issue.[25] | |||||
|
2010-04-23 |
CARPIO, J. |
||||
| An action for injunction is a suit which has for its purpose the enjoinment of the defendant, perpetually or for a particular time, from the commission or continuance of a specific act, or his compulsion to continue performance of a particular act.[23] It has an independent existence, and is distinct from the ancillary remedy of preliminary injunction which cannot exist except only as a part or an incident of an independent action or proceeding.[24] In an action for injunction, the auxiliary remedy of preliminary injunction, prohibitory or mandatory, may issue.[25] | |||||
|
2006-11-02 |
VELASCO, JR., J. |
||||
| Firmly established is the doctrine that "jurisdiction over the subject matter is conferred by law."[35] Section 19 of BP 129 shows that a Regional Trial Court has jurisdiction over all civil cases in which the subject of litigation is incapable of pecuniary estimation.[36] Jurisprudence has recognized complaints for injunction with a prayer for temporary restraining order or writ of preliminary injunction. We explained at length this specie of cases in Manila Banking Corporation v. Court of Appeals.[37] | |||||