This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2010-07-28 |
PERALTA, J. |
||||
| However, this rule is subject to certain exceptions. One of these is when the findings of the appellate court are contrary to those of the trial court.[31] Findings of fact of the trial court and the Court of Appeals may also be set aside when such findings are not supported by the evidence or where the lower courts' conclusions are based on a misapprehension of facts.[32] | |||||
|
2009-05-21 |
CARPIO, J. |
||||
| However, this rule is subject to certain exceptions. One of these is when the findings of the appellate court are contrary to those of the trial court.[22] Findings of fact of the trial court and the Court of Appeals may also be set aside when such findings are not supported by the evidence or where the lower courts' conclusions are based on a misapprehension of facts.[23] Such is the situation in this case and we shall re-examine the facts and evidence presented before the lower courts. | |||||