This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2003-10-03 |
TINGA, J. |
||||
| Anent the ejectment case, we find the issues raised by the petitioners to be factual and, therefore, beyond this Court's power of review. Not being a trier of facts, the Court is not tasked to go over the proofs presented by the parties and analyze, assess, and weigh them to ascertain if the trial court and the appellate court were correct in according them superior credit in this or that piece of evidence of one party or the other.[57] In any event, implicit in the affirmance of the Court of Appeals is the existence of substantial evidence supporting the decisions of the courts below. | |||||