Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 139844 2000-12-15	ATTY. SALOME D. CAÑAS v. LERIO C. CASTIGADOR YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
Viewed in the light of the foregoing circumscription of a court's power to punish for contempt, it bears stressing that the court must exercise the power of contempt judiciously and sparingly with utmost self-restraint,[49] with the end in view of utilizing the same for correction and preservation of the dignity of the court, not for retaliation or vindication.[50] In this case, respondent judge failed to observe the procedure expressly spelled out by Section 3, Rule 71.
	AM No. RTJ-99-1510 2000-11-06	COMMISSIONER RUFUS B. RODRIGUEZ v. JUDGE RODOLFO R. BONIFACIO YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
Viewed vis-à-vis the foregoing circumscription of a court's power to punish for contempt, it bears stressing that the court must exercise the power of contempt judiciously and sparingly with utmost self-restraint[30] with the end in view of utilizing the same for correction and preservation of the dignity of the court, not for retaliation or vindication.[31] In this case, respondent judge failed to observe the procedure expressly spelled out in Section 4, Rule 71 of the Rules.