Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR NO. 121165 2006-09-26	DOMINADOR F. CARILLO v. CA QUISUMBING, J.
It is settled that a person need not be a party to the judgment sought to be annulled.[16] What is essential is that he can prove his allegation that the judgment was obtained by fraud or collusion and he would be adversely affected thereby,[17] because if fully substantiated by preponderance of evidence, those allegations could be the basis for annulment of the assailed judgment.
	GR NO. 121165 2006-09-26	DOMINADOR F. CARILLO v. CA QUISUMBING, J.
It is settled that a person need not be a party to the judgment sought to be annulled.[16] What is essential is that he can prove his allegation that the judgment was obtained by fraud or collusion and he would be adversely affected thereby,[17] because if fully substantiated by preponderance of evidence, those allegations could be the basis for annulment of the assailed judgment.