This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2008-04-23 |
CHICO-NAZARIO, J. |
||||
| Substantial evidence, which is more than a mere scintilla but is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion, would suffice to hold one administratively liable.[30] The standard of substantial evidence is satisfied when there is reasonable ground to believe that respondent is responsible for the misconduct complained of,[31] even if such evidence might not be overwhelming or even preponderant.[32] While substantial evidence does not necessarily import preponderance of evidence as is required in an ordinary civil case,[33] or evidence beyond reasonable doubt as is required in criminal cases,[34] it should be enough for a reasonable mind to support a conclusion. There is none here. | |||||