This case has been cited 1 times or more.
|
2007-03-07 |
CORONA, J. |
||||
| It was clear that, at that point, petitioners were not yet the owners of the property. The execution of the "deed of sale" in their favor was only preliminary to their eventual acquisition of the property.[14] Likewise, although we stated in G.R. No. 111743[15] that the contract of sale between petitioners and PRC had already been perfected, we refrained from declaring them the owners since, pending the execution of the deed of sale or delivery of the property, ownership had yet to transfer to them at that time.[16] | |||||