Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

UST FACULTY UNION v. DIR. BITONIO JR. OF BUREAU OF LABOR RELATIONS

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 169940 2009-09-14	UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS v. SAMAHANG MANGGAGAWA NG UST YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.
Besides, as individual components of a union possessed of a distinct and separate corporate personality, respondent's members should realize that in joining the organization, they have surrendered a portion of their individual freedom for the benefit of all the other members; they submit to the will of the majority of the members in order that they may derive the advantages to be gained from the concerted action of all.[20] Since the will of the members is personified by its board of directors or trustees, the decisions it makes should accordingly bind them. Precisely, a labor union exists in whole or in part for the purpose of collective bargaining or of dealing with employers concerning terms and conditions of employment.[21] What the individual employee may not do alone, as for example obtain more favorable terms and conditions of work, the labor organization, through persuasive and coercive power gained as a group, can accomplish better.
	GR No. 149763 2009-07-07	EDUARDO J. MARIÑO v. GIL Y. GAMILLA CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
On 16 November 1999, the Court promulgated its Decision in G.R. No. 131235, affirming the BLR Resolution dated 15 August 1997 which ruled that the purported election of USTFU officers held on 4 October 1996 was void for violating the Constitution and By-Laws of the union.[17]
	GR No. 180892 2009-04-07	UST FACULTY UNION v. UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS VELASCO JR., J.
On February 11, 1997, the med-arbiter issued a Resolution, declaring the election of the Gamilla group as null and void and ordering that this group cease and desist from performing the duties and responsibilities of USTFU officers. This Resolution was appealed to the Director of the Bureau of Labor Relations (BLR), docketed as BLR Case No. A-8-49-97 and entitled UST Faulty Union, Gil Y. Gamilla, Corazon Qui, et al. v. Med-Arbiter Tomas F. Falconitin of the National Capital Region, Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE), Eduardo J. Mariño, Jr., et al. Later, the director issued a Resolution dated August 15, 1997 affirming the Resolution of the med-arbiter. His Resolution was then appealed to this Court which rendered its November 16, 1999 Decision[10] in G.R. No. 131235 upholding the ruling of the BLR.