This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2014-08-06 |
MENDOZA, J. |
||||
| Before ruling on the propriety of the assailed CA decision, the issue of forum shopping has been brought to the attention of the Court as Diesel pointed out in its Comment,[19] as well as in its Memorandum,[20] that UPSI likewise sought the exclusion of legal interest in another separate petition for certiorari before the CA, docketed as CA-G.R. SP No. 122827 while CA-G.R. SP No. 110926 was still pending before it. For said reason, Diesel prays that the subject petition be summarily dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Section 5, Rule 7 of the Rules of Court. | |||||
|
2014-08-06 |
MENDOZA, J. |
||||
| If at all, it would be the second petition filed before the CA which should be dismissed being an offshoot of the first petition which, based on the records, was what happened as the CA rendered its judgment[23] in CA-G.R. SP No. 122827 dismissing it for being violative of the rule against forum shopping. Thus, there is no legal impediment of any kind that would bar full resolution of the present controversy. | |||||