You're currently signed in as:
User

ARMANDO DE GUZMAN v. SPS. MARIANO AND SUSAN ONG

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

2007-10-17
CHICO-NAZARIO, J.
Indeed, a judgment cannot bind persons who are not parties to the action.  It is elementary that strangers to a case are not bound by the judgment rendered by the court and such judgment is not available as an adjudication either against or in favor of such other person.  A decision of a court will not operate to divest the rights of a person who has not and has never been a party to a litigation, either as plaintiff or as defendant.  Verily, execution of a judgment can only be issued against one who is a party to the action, and not against one who, not being a party to the action, has not yet had his day in court.[16]  That execution may only be effected against the property of the judgment debtor, who must necessarily be a party to the case.[17]
2004-12-16
PER CURIAM
Verily, sheriffs play an important role in the administration of justice. They form an integral part thereof because they are called upon to serve court writs, execute all processes, and carry into effect the orders of the court with due care and utmost diligence.[38] Persons involved in the administration of justice, ought to live up to the strictest standard of honesty and integrity in the public service.[39] As such officer whose duties form an integral part of the administration of justice, a sheriff and his deputies may be properly dismissed, fined or suspended from office by this tribunal, in the exercise of administrative supervision over the judicial branch of the government, for actions committed in violation of the Rules of Court which impedes and detracts from a fair and just administration of justice.[40]