You're currently signed in as:
User
CONTINUE TO LAWYERLY APP

ACTING JUDGE REYNALDO B. BELLOSILLO v. DANTE DE LA CRUZ RIVERA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

Add checked cases to Casebook

AM NO. P-05-1985
2007-07-26
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION v. SANTOS ENRIE P. PEROCHO
PER CURIAM
In Advincula v. Dicen,[10] the Court emphasized that the PDS is an official document required of a government employee and official by the CSC. It is the repository of all information about any government employee and official regarding his personal background, qualification, and eligibility.[11] Since truthful completion of the PDS is a requirement for employment in the judiciary, the importance of answering the same with candor need not be gainsaid.[12] Concealment of any information in the PDS, therefore, warrants disciplinary action against the erring employee.