This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2007-02-07 |
AZCUNA, J. |
||||
| c) In case of death of the losing party after execution is actually levied upon any of his property, the same may be sold for the satisfaction thereof, and the sheriff making the sale shall account to his successor-in-interest, executor or administrator for any surplus in his hands. Notwithstanding the foregoing disquisition though, We are not entirely in accord with the labor arbiter's decision awarding separation pay in favor of the petitioners. In this regard, it [is] worth mentioning that in Kiamco v. NLRC,[11] citing Globe-Mackay Cable and Radio Corp. v. NLRC,[12] the Supreme Court qualified the application of the "strained relations" principle when it held -- | |||||
|
2005-09-21 |
|||||
| In Kiamco vs. NLRC,[5] we held:":The principal test for determining whether particular employees are properly characterized as 'project employees,' as distinguished from 'regular employees,' is whether or not the 'project employees' were assigned to carry out a 'specific project or undertaking,' the duration and scope of which were specified at the time the employees were engaged for that project. As defined, project employees are those workers hired (1) for a specific project or undertaking, and (2) the completion or termination of such project or undertaking has been determined at the time of engagement of the employee." | |||||