Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

This case has been cited 4 times or more.

	GR NO. 168628 2006-12-06	PEOPLE v. EMETERIO RICAMORA Y SUELLO CARPIO MORALES, J.
x x x x[25] (Emphasis supplied) From the above-quoted declarations of private complainant, this Court finds the same stamped with simplicity, consistency and candor to merit full faith and credit.[26]
	GR No. 139400 2003-09-03	PEOPLE v. MAURICIO WATIWAT SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ, J.
Note: After a few seconds... she answered: `Siya po ay nagkakayod.' (He made a pumping motion.)"[15] Indeed, complainant's testimony, stamped with consistency and accuracy, must be given full faith and credit.[16] When a woman testifies that she has been raped, she says in effect, all that is necessary to show that rape has been committed, for as long as her testimony meets the test of credibility.[17]
	GR Nos. 139217-24 2003-06-27	PEOPLE v. NELSON ESPERANZA DAVIDE JR., C.J.
And even granting that the relationship within the third civil degree either of consanguinity or affinity was duly proved during the trial, still such proof cannot be appreciated against Nelson to justify the imposition of the death penalty because he would thereby be denied of his constitutional and statutory right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him. Nelson cannot be charged with committing the crime of rape in its simple form and then be tried and convicted of rape in its qualified form.[49]