You're currently signed in as:
User

HEIRS OF FELICIDAD DIZON v. JAIME D. DISCAYA

This case has been cited 1 times or more.

2005-06-08
AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.
Respondent Gacho also submitted the plan, the technical description of Lot No. 1499 as well as the certification from the Register of Deeds of Lapu-Lapu City, Dioscoro Y. Sanchez, Jr., stating that the Original Certificate of Title of Lot No. 1499 of Opon Cadastre as per records on file has been lost or destroyed during the last Global War. However, these are not the documents referred to under Section 2(f) of R.A. No. 26 but are mere additional documents that will accompany the petition to be forwarded to the Land Registration Authority. In Heirs of Felicidad Dizon vs. Discaya,[22] we held:We now tackle the theory that the "other documents" mentioned in Section 3(f) of RA 26 refer to those enumerated in paragraph 5 of LRC Circular No. 35 dated June 13, 1983, to wit: