Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

COMMISIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CA

This case has been cited 2 times or more.

	GR No. 122213 2005-07-28	CDCP MINING CORPORATION v. CIR TINGA, J.
In a Decision[3] dated 1 February 1999 in G.R. No. 122161 in consolidation with G.R. No. 120991,[4] the Court's First Division granted the Commissioner's petition in G.R. No. 122161, set aside the aforementioned Court of Appeals Decision, and reinstated the CTA's Decision. The judgment in G.R. No. 122161 thus affirmed the CTA's ruling that CDCP was entitled to a tax refund of Thirty Eight Thousand Four Hundred Sixty One Pesos and Eighty Six Centavos (P38,461.86). Said ruling, which had long become final, is wildly disparate from CDCP's present claim that it is entitled to a tax refund of Three Million Two Hundred Twenty Six Thousand Eight Hundred Nine Pesos and Fifteen Centavos (P3,226,809.15).
	GR No. 122213 2005-07-28	CDCP MINING CORPORATION v. CIR TINGA, J.
In a Decision[3] dated 1 February 1999 in G.R. No. 122161 in consolidation with G.R. No. 120991,[4] the Court's First Division granted the Commissioner's petition in G.R. No. 122161, set aside the aforementioned Court of Appeals Decision, and reinstated the CTA's Decision. The judgment in G.R. No. 122161 thus affirmed the CTA's ruling that CDCP was entitled to a tax refund of Thirty Eight Thousand Four Hundred Sixty One Pesos and Eighty Six Centavos (P38,461.86). Said ruling, which had long become final, is wildly disparate from CDCP's present claim that it is entitled to a tax refund of Three Million Two Hundred Twenty Six Thousand Eight Hundred Nine Pesos and Fifteen Centavos (P3,226,809.15).