Lawyerly

You're currently signed in as:
User

PEOPLE v. ARIELITO ALIVIO Y OLIVEROS

This case has been cited 3 times or more.

	GR No. 205472 2016-01-25	AMADO I. SARAUM v. PEOPLE PERALTA, J.
In ascertaining the identity of the illegal drugs and/or drug paraphernalia presented in court as the ones actually seized from the accused, the prosecution must show that: (a) the prescribed procedure under Section 21(1), Article II of R.A. No. 9165 has been complied with or falls within the saving clause provided in Section 21 (a), Article II of the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of R.A. No. 9165;[17] and (b) there was an unbroken link (not perfect link) in the chain of custody with respect to the confiscated items.[18]
	GR No. 176269 2013-11-13	PEOPLE v. KENNETH MONCEDA Y SY BRION, J.
Prosecutions involving illegal drugs depend largely on the credibility of the police officers who conducted the buy-bust operations. We generally defer to the trial court's assessment of the evidence as it had the opportunity to directly observe the witnesses, their demeanor, and their credibility on the witness stand.[28]
	GR No. 191062 2012-09-19	PEOPLE v. MOHAMAD ANGKOB Y MLANG PEREZ, J.
To ascertain the identity of the illegal drugs presented in court as the ones actually seized from the accused, the prosecution must show that: (a) the prescribed procedure under Section 21(1), Article II of Republic Act No. 9165 has been complied with or falls within the saving clause provided in Section 21(a), Article II of the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of Republic Act No. 9165; and (b) there was an unbroken link in the chain of custody with respect to the confiscated items.[26]