This case has been cited 2 times or more.
|
2009-04-16 |
VELASCO JR., J. |
||||
| Then came Rasul v. COMELEC and Aquino-Oreta, in which the Court again stressed that "the word `sole' in Sec. 17, Art. VI of the 1987 Constitution and Sec. 250 of the Omnibus Election Code underscore the exclusivity of the Tribunal's jurisdiction over election contests relating to its members."[24] | |||||
|
2007-04-02 |
CALLEJO, SR., J. |
||||
| With respect to the House of Representatives, it is the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET) that has the sole and exclusive jurisdiction over contests relative to the election, returns and qualifications of its members. The use of the word "sole" in Section 17, Article VI of the Constitution and in Section 250 of the Omnibus Election Code underscores the exclusivity of the Electoral Tribunals' jurisdiction over election contests relating to its members.[11] | |||||